Should Apple Be Making Televisions?
Just mentioning Dell or and Gateway to an Apple user conjures up the work imitator. This goes for PC�s but in the area of flat screen TV�s it ain�t so. In fact, maybe, in this case, Apple should be the one doing the imitating.
Typically, looking at companies like from an Apple user perspective makes one think of the word �imitator�. But in the case of flat-screen televisions should Apple being doing the imitating here? Flat screen televisions are a huge market. These are big-ticket items costing thousands of dollars that take a prominent place in people�s homes.
I am not suggesting that Apple just design a flat-screen TV of their own (although it would most likely be gorgeous) and thrust it on the marketplace. Apple should do what it does best�add value through good design that helps reinvent the way people use their televisions. The digital hub now has all of our photos, camcorder movies, calendars, address books and music. What it is missing is integration with our televisions.
TiVo is the pioneer in this market, allowing us to record television shows on a hard drive for viewing later. There are hybrid products out there for the Mac that let users perform some Tivo-like functions with their Macintosh. Apple needs to use (perhaps even acquire) this technology as a springboard, integrating it into, for lack of a better phrase, a smart television. This television would be able to access your iTunes library (just like Tivo can now). It would let you record shows, integrating with iCal for scheduling. USB and firewire ports could be built in to provide synching for digital devices (including downloading shows to a possible video-pod).
The options are pretty endless, and I�ve only provided a few ideas here. Apple is well positioned to take over yet another part of our digital lifestyle. The television has always been the center of home entertainment, and now that digital TV is here Apple should integrate television with the rest of their product line.
Comments
I couldn’t disagree more. Yeah Gateway has a flat screen television that they are selling, but it is of poor quality, poor design, and not too much cheaper than the other tvs on the market. The amount of R&D needed for Apple to join this market should be spent on other things. Let’s not forget that the iPod was not the first MP3 player on the market. But is was launched just before the dawn of the MP3 player revolution. They saw what the competitors did and they did it better and smarter. The idea of television as the center of the didital hub will not happen for a few more years. Apple should wait to see if this product offering is viable, then join the segment.
Apple’s flat monitors actually make fairly decent TVs if you have a means of applying a tuner or cable/sattelite signal to them!
What they need is a hybrid. If I’m going to buy my TV from Apple, I want it to also be my monitor, and I therefore want it to have an incredible picture quality, not unlike the 20”+ Apple flat pannel monitors.
But, I agree with Greg that the TV-based digital hub is a few years or more off. Places like Good Guys or Circuit City might encourage you to buy an HD-compatible TV and/or satellite receiver (oh, DirecTV, how I love thee) but they’ll admit that it’s not going to be any sort of requirement for years to come. Besides, nearly everyone [in America] has a TV. But, how many have modern TVs? How many can afford to upgrade?
Apple’s TV should be stocked with important features, giving it that distinct level of “Apple is better than you” quality: multiple component ins, progressive scan support (HD-ready), multiple S-Video-ready composite ins, etc. It should have a means to output to speakers, thus containing an amp, not unlike the G5. Maybe it can contain a FireWire and/or USB 2.0 port?
I disagree about the iPod. The MP3 revolution really began as soon as MP3 players were available. The beauty of the iPod is that you don’t have to use MP3s, which audiofiles like myself hate. And, rememember, audiofile means you care more about the gear!